Resultados de la búsqueda

1. Managing the Ross Sea toothfish fisheries – A response to the consultation responses (COMM CIRC 18/39)

   overall catch limit with the following change to the CM 41-09: (i) all areas outside the Ross Sea region ... Secretariat catch and effort monitoring procedure) and proposes a revised approach for catch and effort ... the current fishing season, calculations will be made on historical catch data for the vessels that ... based on data reported from the current season. Because the catch in the Northern area is so small ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-18/07 : Autor(es): CCAMLR Secretariat

2. Measurement of capacity in CCAMLR exploratory fisheries in Subareas 88.1 and 88.2: Secretariat update 2016

   measure of potential daily fishing capacity and the catch limit for an area the notified fishing capacity ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-16/05 : Autor(es): CCAMLR Secretariat

3. Measurement of capacity in CCAMLR exploratory fisheries in Subareas 88.1 and 88.2: Secretariat update 2017

   potential daily fishing capacity and the catch limit for an area the notified fishing capacity in some ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-17/05 : Autor(es): CCAMLR Secretariat

4. A characterisation of the toothfish fishery in the Ross Sea region (Subarea 88.1 and SSRUs 88.2A–B) to 2016–17

   Marine Protected Area (CM 91-05), we recommend catch limit for bycatch species for the North, Slope and ... Abstract:  This report summarises fishing catch and effort in the Ross Sea region (Subarea 88.1 ... and SSRUs 882AB) together with biological characteristics of the catch of Antarctic toothfish through ... the 2017 season. In 2017, sea ice constraints were minimal and catch rates were the second highest on ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-17/07 : Autor(es): S. Parker and S. Mormede

5. Evidence of change to the environment, ecosystem and fishery within Area 48 indicates the need for continued precaution

   Abstract:  CCAMLR manages the krill fishery in Area 48 using a catch limit (the trigger level ... time catches in Subarea 48.1 have increased beyond the maximum pre-1991 catch for that subarea which ... was used to set the trigger level. As a consequence of these major risk factors (increased catch ... very least Conservation Measure 51-07, which defines subarea catch limits and provides additional ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-2019/29 : Autor(es): S. Hill and A. Atkinson

6. Revised research plan for the exploratory longline fishery for Dissostichus spp. in Division 58.4.2 in 2014/15

   considering the precautionary catch limit. The catch limits agreed during the meetings in 2013 increased to ... area is still data-poor area showing low recapture rate. Consequently, providing catch and effort data ... paragraph 6 (iii) of CM 21-02 to collect the catch and effort, CTD, tagged and released, recaptured data ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-14/39 : Autor(es): Delegation of the Republic of Korea

7. Proposal for an acoustic krill biomass survey in CCAMLR Division 58.4.2

   is intended to produce a new estimate of B0 for this Division so that a revised precautionary catch ... limit can be established by CCAMLR. The planned survey will utilise a standardised design as adopted in ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-04/37 : Autor(es): S. Nicol, S. Kawaguchi, T. Jarvis and T. Pauly (Australia)

8. Data from recent trawl surveys in the vicinity of Heard Island and McDonald Islands (Division 58.5.2), reveal an unusual cohort structure in the mackerel icefish (Champsocephalus gunnari) population

   all present simultaneously. A catch limit of 103 t is recommended for the 2011/12 season. Author(s ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-11/22 : Autor(es): D.C. Welsford (Australia)

9. Quantifying the impacts of ice on demersal longlining; a case study in CCAMLR Subarea 88.1

   fishing operations and the result of these impacts on fishing such as the time required to reach the catch ... limit and compression of fishing effort due to a reduction in fishing ground extent in years when sea ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-14/55 Rev. 1 : Autor(es): J.M. Fenaughty and S.J. Parker (New Zealand)

10. Preliminary tag-recapture based population assessment of Antarctic toothfish in Subarea 48.4

    , unchanged from the 2017/18 catch limit. Historically, a precautionary approach has been applied in treating ...

    Meeting Document : WG-FSA-18/26 : Autor(es): T. Earl and A. Riley

Páginas