Resultados de la búsqueda

1. Biomass of krill in Division 58.4.2 and an estimation of precautionary yield, including a subdivision of the precautionary catch limit along the 55ºE longitude

   a subdivision of the precautionary catch limit along the 55ºE longitude ...

   Meeting Document : SC-CAMLR-XXVI/07 : Autor(es): Delegation of Australia

2. ALLOCATING THE PRECAUTIONARY CATCH LIMIT FOR KRILL AMONGST THE SMALL-SCALE MANAGEMENT UNITS IN AREA 48: THE IMPLICATIONS OF DATA UNCERTAINTIES

   catch limit among a set of small-scale management units. So far the Working Group has identified six ... candidate methods for subdividing the catch limit and rejected one of them as unsuitable (Option 1 ... fishing) until a future date. The remaining three options propose subdividing the catch limit according to ... the precautionary catch limit without incurring some risk. Author(s):  P.N. Trathan and S.L. Hill ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-08/12 : Autor(es): P.N. Trathan and S.L. Hill (United Kingdom)

3. Rationale, structure and current templates of the Ecosystem, Productivity, Ocean, Climate (EPOC) modelling framework to support evaluation of strategies to subdivide the Area 48 krill catch limit amongst small-scale management units

   focussed on subdividing the region-wide krill catch limit in the southwest Atlantic into small-scale ... environment for evaluating the strategies for subdividing the krill catch limit and, on the basis of these ... evaluation of strategies to subdivide the Area 48 krill catch limit amongst small-scale management units ...

   Meeting Document : WG-SAM-07/14 : Autor(es): A. Constable (Australia)

4. Options for allocating the precautionary catch limit of krill among small-scale management units in the Scotia Sea

   precautionary catch limit of krill for Area 48 into the small-scale management units (SSMU) adopted at CCAMLR ... allocating the precautionary catch limit of krill among small-scale management units in the Scotia Sea ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-03/36 : Autor(es): R.P. Hewitt, G. Watters (USA) and P.N. Trathan (United Kingdom)

5. THE RISKS OF NOT DECIDING TO ALLOCATE THE PRECAUTIONARY KRILL CATCH LIMIT AMONG SSMUS AND ALLOWING UNCONTROLLED EXPANSION OF THE KRILL FISHERY UP TO THE TRIGGER LEVEL

   risks associated with three options for a Stage-1 allocation of the precautionary krill catch limit ... :  THE RISKS OF NOT DECIDING TO ALLOCATE THE PRECAUTIONARY KRILL CATCH LIMIT AMONG SSMUS AND ALLOWING ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-09/12 : Autor(es): G.M. Watters (USA), S. Hill (United Kingdom), J.T. Hinke (USA) and P. Trathan (United Kingdom)

6. An illustrative management procedure for exploring dynamic feedback in krill catch limit allocations among small-scale management units

   subdivision of the precautionary catch limit for krill among 15 small-scale management units (SSMUs) in the ... feedback in krill catch limit allocations among small-scale management units Approval:  Approved ... underlying dynamics of the resource. Unlike static catch allocation options, the illustrative MPs developed ... subdivide the krill catch between SSMUs. Different MPs are then simulation tested with their performances ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-06/28 : Autor(es): É. Plagányi and D. Butterworth (South Africa)

7. Comment on “further computations of the consequences of setting the annual krill catch limit to a fixed fraction of the estimate of krill biomass from a survey” (WG KRILL 92/4)

   setting the annual krill catch limit to a fixed fraction of the estimate of krill biomass from a survey ...

   Meeting Document : WG-KRILL-92/28 : Autor(es): H. Hiramatsu (Japan)

8. A RISK ASSESSMENT TO ADVISE ON STRATEGIES FOR SUBDIVIDING A PRECAUTIONARY CATCH LIMIT AMONG SMALL-SCALE MANAGEMENT UNITS DURING STAGE 1 OF THE STAGED DEVELOPMENT OF THE KRILL FISHERY IN SUBAREAS 48.1, 48.2, AND 48.3.

   the precautionary krill catch limit among SSMUs in Area 48. Our methodological approach follows ... PRECAUTIONARY CATCH LIMIT AMONG SMALL-SCALE MANAGEMENT UNITS DURING STAGE 1 OF THE STAGED DEVELOPMENT OF THE ... coastal SSMUs, and we do not know how much fishing effort might actually be required to catch the SSMU ... Option 2. Implementation of Fishing Option 4 will, relative to the other two options, substantially limit ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-08/30 : Autor(es): G.M. Watters, J.T. Hinke (USA) and S. Hill (United Kingdom)

9. Estimation of the 2011 catch limit for mackerel icefish (Champsocephalus gunnari) in Subarea 48.3 using a length-based population dynamics model

   . Agnew (UK) Title:  Estimation of the 2011 catch limit for mackerel icefish (Champsocephalus gunnari) in ... Abstract:  A length based projection model is employed to estimate catch limits for the 2011/12 ... total allowable catch of 2349 tonnes. Author(s):  C.T.T. Edwards, R.E. Mitchell, J. Pearce and D.J ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-10/37 : Autor(es): C.T.T. Edwards, R.E. Mitchell, J. Pearce and D.J. Agnew (UK)

10. Further computations of the consequences of setting the annual krill catch limit to a fixed fraction of the estimate of krill biomass from a survey

    consequences of setting the annual krill catch limit to a fixed fraction of the estimate of krill biomass from ... biomass estimate which is set as the catch for a 20-year period. Three alternative fishing seasons are ... , allows a greater catch (for the same risk of depletion) than in the case of fishing in winter. Author(s ...

    Meeting Document : WG-KRILL-92/04 : Autor(es): D.S. Butterworth, G.R. Gluckman and S. Chalis (South Africa)

Páginas