Resultados de la búsqueda

1. Revised research plan for the exploratory longline fishery for Dissostichus spp. in 2015/16 in Division 58.4.2

   catch limit according to CCAMLR decision rules. This paper presents a proposal for a research plan for ... decision rules, the catch limit should remain unchanged at 35 tonnes for 2015/16 to maximize the ... . Robust stock assessment and catch limits according to CCAMLR decision rules remain to be determined for ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-15/74 : Autor(es): A. Rélot-Stirnemann (France)

2. Research plan for exploratory fishing for toothfish (Dissostichus spp.) in 2016/17 in Division 58.4.1 by France

   assessment. The aim is to collect sufficient data to provide an advice on a catch limit according to CCAMLR ... seabed analogy. In the absence of an assessment using the CCAMLR decision rules, the catch limit should ... . Robust stock assessment and catch limits according to CCAMLR decision rules remain to be determined for ...

   Meeting Document : WG-SAM-16/01 : Autor(es): Delegation of France

3. Revised research plan for the exploratory fisheries for Dissostichus spp. in Subarea 48.6 in 2014/15

   small catch limit. Regarding relatively high CPUE in the area, we propose to increase the catch limit ... enough evidence to estimate plausible stock size, and accordingly have yet to estimate appropriate catch ... limit, we propose to continue the current research operation for at least 3 years with the same sample ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-14/17 : Autor(es): Delegation of Japan

4. Continuation of multi-Member research on the Dissostichus spp. exploratory fishery in 2017/18 in Division 58.4.3a by France and Japan

   limit for Dissostichus spp. is 32 tons in 2014/2015 and the total reported catch up was 16.3 tons. For ... the last season (2015/16), the catch limit was unchanged (32 tons) but no catch up was reported due to ... block by two vessels using longlines: Shinsei Maru No. 3 (Japan) and the Saint André (France). The catch ...

   Meeting Document : WG-SAM-17/04 : Autor(es): Delegations of France and Japan

5. Continuation of multi-Member research on the Dissostichus eleginoides exploratory fishery in 2017/18 in Division 58.4.3a by France and Japan

   ). The catch limit for Dissostichus spp. is 32 tonnes in 2014/2015 and the total reported catch up was ... 16.3 tonnes. For the season (2015/16), the catch limit was unchanged (32 tonnes) but no catch up was ... vessel. For 2017, one vessel from France visited Division 58.4.3a for a catch of 1.68 tonnes. The ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-17/55 : Autor(es): Delegations of France and Japan

6. A characterisation of the toothfish fishery in Subareas 88.1 and 88.2 from 1997/98 to 2004/05

   3477 t against a catch limit of 3625 t. The catch limit was almost reached in Subarea 88.1 and exceeded ... toothfish and the associated bycatch. The 2005 D. mawsoni catch was the highest on record with a total of ... in Subarea 88.2. D. mawsoni was the dominant catch in all 11 SSRUs fished. The main bycatch species ... were rattails, which contributed 12% of the catch, and skates which contributed to about 2% of the ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-05/29 : Autor(es): S.M. Hanchet, M.L. Stevenson, N.L. Phillips and A. Dunn (New Zealand)

7. A characterisation of the toothfish fishery in Subareas 88.1 and 88.2 from 1997–98 to 2010–11

   slope SSRUs 88.1H and 88.1I, and SSRU 88.1K. About 63% of the catch limit in the north was taken from ... 88.1C with the rest taken from SSRU 88.1B. The catch limit from the shelf was taken mainly from 881J ... location of fishing together with the catch of Dissostichus spp. and bycatch species by year for the period ... 1997–98 to 2010–11. During the 2010–11 fishing year most of the catch in Subarea 88.1 came from the ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-11/45 : Autor(es): M.L. Stevenson, S.M. Hanchet, S. Mormede and A. Dunn (New Zealand)

8. Further investigations in the assessment of Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) in Subarea 88.2 SSRUs 88.2C–H for the years 2002–03 to 2012–13

   the stock assessment including all data from SSRUs 88.2C-H and the catch limit applied to the same ... SSRU 88.2H is recognised by allocating a greater proportion of the catch limit to SSRUs 88.2C–G and ...

   Meeting Document : WG-SAM-14/29 : Autor(es): S. Mormede, A. Dunn and S.M. Hanchet (New Zealand)

9. Characteristics of krill aggregations in 48.4 subdivision during January–February 2000

   recommended precautionary catch limit. There have been revealed that potential fishing grounds could be ... potential fishing grounds to remove the recommended precautionary catch limit. The latter is an important ... corresponding to recommended precautionary limit could be possible from such grounds, however, the predicted ... catch per trawling hour is low Therefore, the investigations carries out demonstrated a practical ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-01/42 : Autor(es): S.M. Kasatkina, A.P. Malyshko, V.N.Shnar and O.A. Berezhinskiy (Russia)

10. The orderly development of the krill fishery

    Abstract:  During deliberations at CCAMLR XXV on revising the precautionary catch limit for krill ... establish a catch limit before fishing is prosecuted in these areas. o Small-scale management units be ... recommends that: o Krill stock surveys be undertaken in areas with no precautionary catch limits in order to ... capacity be established for the fishery relative to the catch limits (small or large scale spatial limits ...

    Meeting Document : CCAMLR-XXVI/30 : Autor(es): Delegation of Australia

Páginas