Resultados de la búsqueda

1. A CHARACTERISATION OF THE TOOTHFISH FISHERY IN SUBAREAS 88.1 AND 88.2 FROM 1997–98 TO 2007–08

   catch was the fourth highest on record with a total of 2666 t against a combined catch limit of 3207 t ... catch limit being slightly exceeded in the 2006 season, two catch limits in the 2007 season, and none in ... the 2008 season. The catch limit was under caught in both Subareas 88.1 and 88.2 during the 2008 ... of the fishery by having fewer catch limits. This appeared to be moderately successful, with only one ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-08/22 : Autor(es): M.L. Stevenson, S.M. Hanchet and A. Dunn (New Zealand)

2. Preliminary evaluation of two feedback management strategies for the krill fishery in Subareas 48.1–48.3

   catch limit and a spatial distribution of this limit. We used KPFM2 to assess the risks of feedback ... management strategies in which the overall catch limit is dynamically redistributed among small scale ... ‑2) or (2) changes in penguin abundance. Relative to the case in which the overall catch limit is ...

   Meeting Document : SC-CAMLR-XXXVII/BG/12 : Autor(es): Delegation of the USA

3. Propuesta para establecer un Área Marina Protegida en la región del Mar de Ross

   seamount; changes to the catch limit formula in the Special Research Zone as a percentage of the overall ... catch limit for the Ross Sea fishery, thus linking this catch limit to the Scientific Committee’s ...

   Meeting Document : CCAMLR-XXXII/27 : Autor(es): Delegations of New Zealand and the USA

4. Towards the development of an assessment of stock abundance for Subarea 88.2 SSRUs 88.2C–G – a discussion paper

   main grounds previously fished in SSRUs 88.2C–G. An upper catch limit could be set for each of these ... limit for SSRUs 88.2C–G will be constrained by the total catch limit for the wider Amundsen Sea stock ... grounds based on historic CPUE and a maximum local exploitation rate. It should be noted that the catch ...

   Meeting Document : WG-SAM-14/28 : Autor(es): S.M. Hanchet and S.J. Parker (New Zealand)

5. 2015-16 Research plan in Division 58.4.4 for Dissostichus spp.

   , the catch limit for Dissostichus spp. is 25 tons for SSRU C and 35 tons for SSRU D. France notified ... its intention to achieve a robust stock assessment that would provide advice on a catch limit ... the CCAMLR decision rules, the catch limit should remain unchanged for 2015/16 to maximize the ...

   Meeting Document : WG-SAM-15/52 : Autor(es): Delegation of France

6. Research plan for the exploratory longline fishery for Dissostichus spp. in 2015/16 in Division 58.4.4

   , the catch limit for Dissostichus spp. is 25 tons for SSRU C and 35 tons for SSRU D. France notified ... its intention to achieve a robust stock assessment that would provide advice on a catch limit ... the CCAMLR decision rules, the catch limit should remain unchanged at 32 tonnes for 2015/16 to ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-15/67 : Autor(es): A. Rélot-Stirnemann (France)

7. A CHARACTERISATION OF THE TOOTHFISH FISHERY IN SUBAREAS 88.1 AND 88.2 FROM 1997/98 TO 2008/09

   fishery which may be indicative of localised stock depletion. We considered here the catch limit, changes ... in depth/location of fishing, and length and age structure of the population. The catch limit was ... difficulties in accurately predicting when catches would exceed the catch limit (using the Secretariat’s ... distribution of sea-ice, the SSRU catch and bycatch limits, and an increase in knowledge of the various grounds ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-09/36 : Autor(es): S.M. Hanchet, A. Dunn and S. Mormede (New Zealand)

8. Proposal for an extension to the mark recapture experiment to estimate toothfish population size in Subarea 48.4

   the southern area of 48.4. 5. A catch limit of 75 tonnes is proposed for D. eleginoides the northern ... area, where D. mawsoni will remain a bycatch species. A combined catch limit of 75 tonnes is proposed ... the catch limit for Dissostichus species. In the Southern Area, catches taken at these proportions ... for D. eleginoides and D. mawsoni in the southern area. 6. It is proposed that catch limits are ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-08/46 : Autor(es): J. Roberts and D. J. Agnew (UK)

9. A characterisation of the toothfish fishery in Subareas 88.1 and 88.2 from 1997/98 to 2009/10

   881H and 881I, with a reduced catch from 881K due to ice conditions. The catch limit in the north was ... all taken from 881C, whilst the catch limit from the shelf was taken mainly from 881J. Most catch from ... limit was under caught by 250 t. Unstandardised catch per set and catch per hook have varied ... fishing together with the catch of Dissostichus spp and bycatch species by year for the period 1997–98 to ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-10/23 : Autor(es): S.M. Hanchet, M.L. Stevenson and A. Dunn (New Zealand)

10. Effects of recruitment variability and natural mortality on Generalised Yield Model projections and the CCAMLR Decision Rules for Antarctic krill

    fishing, or with fishing at either the trigger level (gamma = 0.0103), the precautionary catch limit ... (gamma = 0.093), or half the precautionary catch limit (gamma = 0.0465). Simulations were assigned ... . At the higher catches of the precautionary catch limit, populations based on recruitment vectors from ... support the trigger level of catch with a less than 10% chance of the population spawning biomass falling ...

    Meeting Document : WG-EMM-12/26 : Autor(es): D. Kinzey, G. Watters and C. Reiss (USA)

Páginas