Resultados de la búsqueda

1. REVISION OF THE CONSERVATION MEASURE 51-07 (2009) INTERIM DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRIGGER LEVEL IN KRILL FISHERY IN STATISTICAL SUBAREAS 48.1, 48.2, 48.3 AND 48.4

   ) INTERIM DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRIGGER LEVEL IN KRILL FISHERY IN STATISTICAL SUBAREAS 48.1, 48.2, 48.3 AND ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-11/27 : Autor(es): L. Pshenichnov and G. Milinevsky (Ukraine)

2. Evidence of change to the environment, ecosystem and fishery within Area 48 indicates the need for continued precaution

   Abstract:  CCAMLR manages the krill fishery in Area 48 using a catch limit (the trigger level ... was used to set the trigger level. As a consequence of these major risk factors (increased catch ... be greater now than when the trigger level was established. Ideally CCAMLR should establish a process ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-2019/29 : Autor(es): S. Hill and A. Atkinson

3. Advances are urgently needed in providing regular estimates of krill stock status based on the available data

   measure (the trigger level) which was established in 1991 and is “not related to the status of the krill ... trigger level is not related to the status of the stock. The establishing terms of reference for WG-EMM ... and CCAMLR still manages the krill fishery using the trigger level. Here we describe the single ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-2019/28 : Autor(es): S. Hill, J. Hinke, N. Ratcliffe, P. Trathan and G. Watters

4. Distribución provisional del nivel crítico de captura para la pesquería de Euphausia superba en las Subáreas estadísticas 48.1, 48.2, 48.3 y 48.4

   proposes to upgrade the Conservation Measure 51-07 in order to redistribute the trigger level of catch in ... distribution of the trigger level in the fishery for Euphausia superba in statistical Subareas 48.1, 48.2, 48.3 ...

   Meeting Document : CCAMLR-XXXV/30 : Autor(es): Delegation of Ukraine

5. Is current management of the Antarctic krill fishery in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean precautionary?

   (or “trigger level”), established in 1991, is 0.62 million tonnes year-1, equivalent to ~1% of the ... conservative estimates of the regional biomass in recent years. This suggests that the trigger level would be ... <3% because annual catches have been <50% of the regional trigger level since 1991. The subarea ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-16/21 : Autor(es): S. Hill, A. Atkinson, C. Darby, S. Fielding, B. Krafft, O.R. Godø, G. Skaret, P. Trathan and J. Watkins

6. DETECTION OF VULNERABLE MARINE ECOSYSTEMS IN THE SOUTHERN SCOTIA ARC (CCAMLR SUBAREAS 48.1 AND 48.2) THROUGH RESEARCH BOTTOM TRAWL SAMPLING AND UNDERWATER IMAGERY

   trigger level that could be used to provide a basis for notification of a VME, based on CCAMLR Scientific ... ’ vs. ‘light’ VME indicator taxa with consequences on the proposed trigger, as well as the rationale ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-09/32 : Autor(es): S.J. Lockhart and C.D. Jones (USA)

7. A RISK ASSESSMENT TO ADVISE ON STRATEGIES FOR SUBDIVIDING A PRECAUTIONARY CATCH LIMIT AMONG SMALL-SCALE MANAGEMENT UNITS DURING STAGE 1 OF THE STAGED DEVELOPMENT OF THE KRILL FISHERY IN SUBAREAS 48.1, 48.2, AND 48.3.

   move, to a lesser extent than Fishing Option 2. Up to harvest rates defining the current trigger level ... past that defining the current trigger level, the risks of depleting penguin and fish populations ... , in a few SSMUs, such risks even occur at harvest rates near the rate defining the current trigger ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-08/30 : Autor(es): G.M. Watters, J.T. Hinke (USA) and S. Hill (United Kingdom)

8. Spatial aggregation of harvesting in Subarea 48.1, in particular during the summer and close to the coast

   was closed having reached the Subarea trigger allocation. Though the collective catch comprised 27% of ... the Subarea trigger allocation, it is uncertain whether any ecological impact ensued, as there was no ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-16/17 : Autor(es): P. Trathan and S. Hill

9. Feedback management through effort regulation

   Abstract:  The interim distribution of the trigger level in the fishery for Antarctic krill (CM 51 ... -01) will be revised in 2016. The trigger level is not related to the status of the krill stock and ...

   Meeting Document : SC-CAMLR-XXXV/BG/29 Rev. 1 : Autor(es): Delegation of Norway

10. 30 years of krill fisheries management – challenges remain

    establishment of CM 51-07 – distributing the trigger limit among statistical subareas – was a step in the right ... direction. CCAMLR should retain CM 51-07 to avoid concentrating the catch in one sub-area as the trigger ...

    Meeting Document : CCAMLR-XXX/BG/19 : Autor(es): Submitted by ASOC

Páginas