CCAMLR

The distribution of kri!! harvesting effort and associated catch rates has previously only been available to the scientific community in the form of sub-area or fine-scale(0.5 ° latitude by 1 ° longitude) recorded statistics. Earlier analyses of these data have shown this was a shelf-break fishery over much of the Scotia Sea. Although these statistics give a general idea of where the fishery has operated they do not reveal the localised nature of the fishing operation. In particular they give little ecological insight into how the fishable aggregations relate to the local environmental conditions. Over the last three winter fishing seasons (1993-1995) haul by haul statistics have been recorded in the South Georgia area. Analyses of these data show marked interannual variability and indications of a seasonal pattern. In 1994 the fishery was almost totally based over a large shallow bank area on the north-east shelf edge. During 1995 the fishery was still predominantly in this area but also operated further west on a range of banks associated with submarine canyons. The data for 1993 were only available from August but the fishery was restricted in that period to an area on the western edge of the shelf break where negligible fishing occurred in the following two seasons. The results are discussed in relation to the ecology of krill and the fishery interaction with the local predator colonies.

Adelie penguins are long-lived, highly philopatric seabirds that dominate the bird biomass of the Western Antarctic Peninsula region, and serve as focal animals for our Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) study of the effects of environmental variability on animal populations in the Antarctic marine ecosystem. The major physical factors affecting the breeding success, distribution and demography of Adelie penguins in the Southern Ocean are variability in sea ice cover, ocean circulation patterns and terrestrial topography. We analyzed Adelie distributions in the Antarctic Peninsula region and concluded that Adelie penguins have discrete subpopulations in the northeastern and southwestern regions of the area. These subpopulations are separated by a 400 km gap in their respective distributions, but each is within several hundred kilometers of predictable pack ice areas in the Weddell and Bellingshausen Seas, respectively. We propose that these pack ice areas are the wintering grounds for each subpopulation, and that access to these pack ice areas, early in the season following courtship fasting, is the key to successful breeding in Adelies. We further analyzed the colony distributions within each subpopulation and found highly clumped distributions of Adelie penguins that were strongly correlated to physical factors such as bathymetry, currents and wind direction. We propose that these variables reduce the occurance of pack ice in the vicinity of breeding colonies of Adelie penguin populations, thereby assuring access to open water in the early season. Finally, we examined the influence of the interaction of local topography and weather on the size, location and persistence of breeding groups within Adelie penguin colonies. Snow accumulation, melt water runoff and solar radiation all impact the microclimate of breeding colonies and influence the selection of nesting sites among Adelie penguins. The abandonment of breeding areas by Adelie penguins, following two to three years of failure at "poor" sites, suggests that changes in the population distribution of Adelie penguins may be very rapid in response to changing environmental conditions, such as increased snow deposition. Adaptations to environmental variability are seen in every aspect of the natural history of the Adelie penguin, from the distribution of subpopulations around Antarctica, to the sizes and distributions of colonies within regions, to the choice of breeding sites within colonies.

Diets of diurnal and overnight foraging chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) breeding at Seal Island during chick-brooding period of 1988/89, 1989/90, 1993/94 and 1994/59 were analyzed. Diet mass estimated from digested and intact stomach contents indicates that krill were predominant in their diets but fish constituted 0-1 % and 14-45 % of the diet of diurnal and overnight foragers respectively. The highest intake of fish was observed in 1993/94 when krill abundance was very low. Calorific values of the estimated diet mass were 4085 kJ for diurnal foragers and 4809 kJ for overnight foragers, which were comparable with daily average energy requirements calculated for a diurnal forager (4853 kJ) and an overnight forager (5732 kJ) based on available input parameters. A comparison of krill in the diet and those in the foraging areas indicates that diurnal foragers took krill in the inshore region, where krill tended to be smaller and less matured. On the other hand, overnight foragers took krill in the offshore region, where krill tended to be larger and matured, and also in the inshore region. Overnight foraging penguins tended to select larger female krill, but diurnal foragers tended to select subadult male krill; both foragers took very few adult male krill and juvenile krill. It is, therefore, considered that both foragers tend to take larger krill of the least capable of avoiding capture in their respecitve foraging areas.