The WCF was established in 2019, as approved by the Commission (CCAMLR-XXXVII, paragraph 4.5). The Secretariat is required to report each year on the activities, if any, of the WCF.

In accordance with a SCAF decision (SCAF-2018, paragraph 53), this paper lists the Special Funds that are currently dormant for consideration by the Commission.

In accordance with CM 10-10, paragraph 2(i), and the procedure detailed in COMM CIRC 20/73, the Secretariat has prepared the Summary CCAMLR Compliance Report (Summary Report) based on the Draft CCAMLR Compliance Reports (Draft reports), responses received from Contracting Parties, and the suggested preliminary compliance status. The Draft reports identified 45 potential conservation measure compliance issues in relation to 17 conservation measures affecting 12 Contracting Parties in the period 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020 (the compliance reporting period). The Secretariat circulated Draft reports on 12 August 2019 and the Summary Report containing Contracting Party responses is Annex 1 to this paper.

This report, for the 12-month period since CCAMLR-38, includes a section on major highlights and staffing matters. It is accompanied by an Implementation Report for the second year of the Secretariat’s Strategic Plan and Salary and Staffing Strategy (2019–2022) (Annex A). 

A successful development of a krill fishery management strategy has become a matter of importance for CCAMLR. The Commission has also noted that successfully implementing the krill fishery management strategy within the current lifetime of CM 51-07 will be a significant challenge. Recently, evidences of changes in krill fishing having effects on penguin population dynamics have suggested that CM 51-07 might not be precautionary enough. The work on a new management strategy is progressing and while the reasons why we urgently need to progress towards a feedback management strategy are clear, during the last EMM virtual meeting, the existence and the need to address some uncertainties, such as the precautionary level of the Risk Assessment and the accuracy of the stock assessment parameters, was acknowledged. Some of the uncertainties can be tackled in a relatively short time while others will need to be addressed over a longer time frame. In this document we argue that the D1MPA proposal is a valid alternative as a tool to guarantee the safeguard of the marine living resources in Antarctica, where conservation includes rational use as required by Article II of the Convention.