Search results

1. REVISION OF THE CONSERVATION MEASURE 51-07 (2009) INTERIM DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRIGGER LEVEL IN KRILL FISHERY IN STATISTICAL SUBAREAS 48.1, 48.2, 48.3 AND 48.4

   Abstract:  Due to the need to distribute the krill catch limit in Statistical Area 48 so ... the interim Conservation Measure 51-07 (2009) since management advice on a SSMU krill catch limit allocation ... Due to the need to distribute the krill catch limit in Statistical Area 48 so as to ensure ... Conservation Measure 51-07 (2009) since management advice on a SSMU krill catch limit allocation subdivision ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-11/27 : Author(s): L. Pshenichnov and G. Milinevsky (Ukraine)

2. Characteristics of krill aggregations in 48.4 subdivision during January–February 2000

   catch limit. There have been revealed that potential fishing grounds could be situated within the zones ... precautionary limit could be possible from such grounds, however, the predicted catch per trawling hour is low ... the recommended precautionary catch limit. The latter is an important link for regulating fishery according ... precautionary catch limit. There have been revealed that potential fishing grounds could be situated within ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-01/42 : Author(s): S.M. Kasatkina, A.P. Malyshko, V.N.Shnar and O.A. Berezhinskiy (Russia)

3. A characterisation of the toothfish fishery in Subareas 88.1 and 88.2 from 1997/98 to 2004/05

   of 3477 t against a catch limit of 3625 t. The catch limit was almost reached in Subarea 88.1 and exceeded ... in the closure of all SSRUs due to catch limits for toothfish, or bycatch limits for rattails, being reached ... a catch limit of 3625 t. The catch limit was almost reached in Subarea 88.1 and exceeded in Subarea 88.2 ... SSRUs due to catch limits for toothfish, or bycatch limits for rattails, being reached by 18 March 2005 ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-05/29 : Author(s): S.M. Hanchet, M.L. Stevenson, N.L. Phillips and A. Dunn (New Zealand)

4. Finfish research proposals for Subarea 48.6 by Koryo Maru 11 for 2012/13 (this is a revision of WG-SAM-12/12)

   by that analysis.  The preliminary assessment indicates that the historic precautionary maximum catch limit of 200 ... that the historic precautionary maximum catch limit of 200 tonnes of Dissostichus spp. for Subarea 48.6 south of 60 ... °S may be sustainable.  Therefore the historic maximum catch limits are assumed for this research plan ... by that analysis.  The preliminary assessment indicates that the historic precautionary maximum catch limit ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-12/30 : Author(s): C. Heiniken and R. Ball (South Africa)

5. Continuation of multi-Member research on the Dissostichus eleginoides exploratory fishery in 2017/18 in Division 58.4.3a by France and Japan

   ). The catch limit for Dissostichus spp. is 32 tonnes in 2014/2015 and the total reported catch up was 16.3 ... tonnes. For the season (2015/16), the catch limit was unchanged (32 tonnes) but no catch up was reported ... ; (France). The catch limit for Dissostichus spp. is 32 tonnes in 2014/2015 and the total reported catch up ... was 16.3 tonnes. For the season (2015/16), the catch limit was unchanged (32 tonnes) but no catch up ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-17/55 : Author(s): Delegations of France and Japan

6. Resource support for conducting scientific programs in the Ross Sea region MPA: comments and proposals

   research catch limits in the MPA should be allocated. The Scientific Committee's current ... the sources for establishing the toothfish catch limit for conducting research in the RSRMPA and endorse ... to CM 91-05/C. Russia considers the catch limit for any research in the Ross Sea region MPA should ... not be deducted from catch limits for exploratory fishing outside the MPA. ...

   Meeting Document : SC-CAMLR-38/12 : Author(s): Делегация Российской Федерации

7. Defining smaller-scale management units to further develop the ecosystem approach in managing large-scale pelagic krill fisheries in Antarctica

   expected across all units once the catch limit had been reached. Other units in which fishing ... was not occurring could be monitored as well. This process could help determine whether or not the catch limit ... , it is possible to determine, well in advance of the catch limit being reached, whether or not local restrictions ... equal, to the intensity expected across all units once the catch limit had been reached. Other units ... all units once the catch limit had been reached. Other units in which fi shing was not occurring ... could be monitored as well. This process could help determine whether or not the catch limit ... , it is possible to determine, well in advance of the catch limit being reached, whether or not local ... ). CCAMLR currently manages its fi sheries by setting catch limits for statistical subdivisions ...

   Science Journal Paper : CCAMLR Science, Volume 9 (CCAMLR Science, Volume 9) : 117–131 : Author(s): Constable, A.J. and S. Nicol

8. The orderly development of the krill fishery

   Abstract:  During deliberations at CCAMLR XXV on revising the precautionary catch limit for krill ... be undertaken in areas with no precautionary catch limits in order to establish a catch limit before fishing ... for the fishery relative to the catch limits (small or large scale spatial limits). o A program to monitor ... During deliberations at CCAMLR XXV on revising the precautionary catch limit for krill ...

   Meeting Document : CCAMLR-XXVI/30 : Author(s): Delegation of Australia

9. Continuation of multi-Member research on the Dissostichus spp. exploratory fishery in 2017/18 in Division 58.4.3a by France and Japan

   limit for Dissostichus spp. is 32 tons in 2014/2015 and the total reported catch up was 16.3 tons ... . For the last season (2015/16), the catch limit was unchanged (32 tons) but no catch up was reported due ... vessels using longlines: Shinsei Maru No. 3 (Japan) and the Saint André (France). The catch limit ... (2015/16), the catch limit was unchanged (32 tons) but no catch up was reported due to engine damage ...

   Meeting Document : WG-SAM-17/04 : Author(s): Delegations of France and Japan

10. A preliminary assessment of mackerel icefish (Champsocephalus gunnari) in Division 58.5.2, based on results from the 2013 random stratified trawl survey

    to be unavailable beyond 2013/14. Under the first scenario, a catch limit of 764 t is recommended for 2013/14 ... and 571t for 2014/15, while under the second scenario, a catch limit of 1267 t is recommended for 2013/14 ... is likely to be unavailable beyond 2013/14. Under the first scenario, a catch limit of 764 t is recommended ... for 2013/14 and 571t for 2014/15, while under the second scenario, a catch limit of 1267 t is recommended ...

    Meeting Document : WG-FSA-13/23 : Author(s): D.C. Welsford (Australia)

Pages