Search results

1. Revised research plan for the exploratory fisheries for Dissostichus spp. in Subarea 48.6 in 2014/15

   stock size, and accordingly have yet to estimate appropriate catch limit, we propose to continue ... (only 13 and 14 hauls in 2013 and 2014, respectively) associated with the small catch limit. Regarding ... relatively high CPUE in the area, we propose to increase the catch limit from current 50 tonnes to 100 tonnes ... stock size, and accordingly have yet to estimate appropriate catch limit, we propose to continue ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-14/17 : Author(s): Delegation of Japan

2. Managing the Ross Sea toothfish fisheries – A response to the consultation responses (COMM CIRC 18/39)

   is minimised by allowing both over- or under- runs to be accommodated within the overall catch limit ... by allowing both over- or under- runs to be accommodated within the overall catch limit with the following ... Secretariat catch and effort monitoring procedure) and proposes a revised approach for catch and effort ... fishing season, calculations will be made on historical catch data for the vessels that have notified ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-18/07 : Author(s): CCAMLR Secretariat

3. A compilation of parameters for ecosystem dynamics models of the Scotia Sea – Antarctic Peninsula region

   –Antarctic Peninsula region beyond the current operational catch limit requires the development ... and assessment of methods for subdividing the precautionary catch limit amongst smaller spatial units. This paper ... the current operational catch limit requires the development and assessment of methods for subdividing ... the precautionary catch limit amongst smaller spatial units. This paper compiles parameters for use in the ecosystem ... of the krill fi shery in the Scotia Sea–Antarctic Peninsula region beyond the current operational catch limit ... requires the development and assessment of methods for subdividing the precautionary catch limit amongst ... –Antarctic Peninsula region (FAO Statistical Area 48) beyond the current operational catch limit requires ... the development and assessment of meth- ods for subdividing the precautionary catch limit among smaller spatial ...

   Science Journal Paper : CCAMLR Science, Volume 14 (CCAMLR Science, Volume 14) : 1–25 : Author(s): Hill, S.L., K. Reid, S.E. Thorpe, J. Hinke and G.M. Watters

4. Is current management of the Antarctic krill fishery in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean precautionary?

   ) for management and reporting purposes. The effective regional catch limit (or ‘trigger level’), established ... subarea has also had its own catch limit, between 0.093 and 0.279 million tonnes year –1, since 2009 ... to maintain the krill stock and support krill predators. Subarea catch limits exceed 9.3% of conservatively ... is precautionary at the regional scale. The subarea catch limits help prevent excessive concentration of catch ... to 48.4) for management and reporting purposes. The effective regional catch limit (or ‘trigger level ... in 2000. Each subarea has also had its own catch limit, between 0.093 and 0.279 million tonnes year ... format to introduce the current catch limits; to explain the basis for these catch limits and clarify ... allowed to catch) with biomass estimates; and to assess whether these catch limits are precautionary ...

   Science Journal Paper : CCAMLR Science, Volume 23 (CCAMLR Science, Volume 23) : 31–51 : Author(s): Hill, S.L., A. Atkinson, C. Darby, S. Fielding, B.A. Krafft, O.R. Godø, G. Skaret, P.N. Trathan and J.L. Watkins

5. Updating the Antarctic krill biomass estimates for CCAMLR Subareas 48.1 to 48.4 using available data

   ) and that the potential exploitation rates implied by the operational catch limit (the trigger level) were below 2% during ... suggests that the trigger level is a highly precautionary operational catch limit which is currently ... ) and that the potential exploitation rates implied by the operational catch limit (the trigger level) were below 2% during ... suggests that the trigger level is a highly precautionary operational catch limit which is currently ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-15/28 : Author(s): S. Hill, A. Atkinson, C. Darby, S. Fielding (United Kingsom), B. Krafft, O.R. Godø, G. Skaret (Norway), P. Trathan, J. Watkins (United Kingdom)

6. Assessment models for Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) in the Ross Sea region to 2016/17

   t. This yield is higher than that specified for 2018 in CM 91-05, which states that “the total catch limit shall ... is higher than the range specified in CM 91-05 for 2018, we therefore recommend that the catch limit be set ... t. This yield is higher than that specified for 2018 in CM 91-05, which states that “the total catch limit ... that the catch limit be set at 3 157 tonnes for the 2018 and 2019 fishing seasons as per CM 91-05. ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-17/37 Rev. 1 : Author(s): S. Mormede

7. Is current management of the Antarctic krill fishery in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean precautionary?

   , precautionary assessment of exploitation rate in this fishery. The effective regional catch limit (or “trigger ... estimated in 2000. Additional subarea catch limits were established in 2009. There is some evidence ... , derived from the subarea catch limit, appears to exceed this level in up to 20% of years due to high ... annual catches have been <50% of the regional trigger level since 1991. The subarea catch limits help ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-16/21 : Author(s): S. Hill, A. Atkinson, C. Darby, S. Fielding, B. Krafft, O.R. Godø, G. Skaret, P. Trathan and J. Watkins

8. Further investigations in the assessment of Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) in Subarea 88.2 SSRUs 88.2C–H for the years 2002–03 to 2012–13

   , with the stock assessment including all data from SSRUs 88.2C-H and the catch limit applied to the same region ... is recognised by allocating a greater proportion of the catch limit to SSRUs 88.2C–G and less to SSRU 88.2H ... including all data from SSRUs 88.2C-H and the catch limit applied to the same region. That R3 be chosen ... by allocating a greater proportion of the catch limit to SSRUs 88.2C–G and less to SSRU 88.2H. That all ...

   Meeting Document : WG-SAM-14/29 : Author(s): S. Mormede, A. Dunn and S.M. Hanchet (New Zealand)

9. Revised research plan for the 2013/14 exploratory longline fishery of Dissostichus spp. in Division 58.4.3a

   to estimate appropriate catch limit, we propose to conduct the current research operation for at least 3 years ... Abstract:  Catch and effort data recorded by all vessels were analyzed using the latest CCAMLR C2 ... for successful research, as it may excessively limit the available area for research hauls. For this reason, we ... -concentration of catch and effort can be avoided while reducing the inconveniences for operation. Similarly ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-13/40 : Author(s): Delegation of Japan

10. Characteristics of krill aggregations in the South Sandwich Islands subarea in January–February 2000

    potential fishing grounds where the recommended precautionary catch limit could be taken. Such fishing ... precautionary catch limit could be taken. Such fishing grounds could be located within the zones in which swarms ... to a recommended precautionary limit could be possible from such grounds despite a predicted low catch per hour ... tonnes. It was shown that the removal of biomass up to a recommended precautionary limit could ... catch limit could be taken. Such fi shing grounds could be located within the zones in which swarms ... aggregation forms in order to detect potential fi shing grounds where the precautionary catch limit ... exceeds the CCAMLR precautionary catch limit of Kasatkina et al. 152 0.832 million tonnes (CCAMLR ... with the precautionary catch limit may be possible irrespective of the predicted low catch per hour of trawling ...

    Science Journal Paper : CCAMLR Science, Volume 9 (CCAMLR Science, Volume 9) : 145–164 : Author(s): Kasatkina, S.M., A.P. Malyshko, V.N. Shnar and O.A. Berezhinsky

Pages