Search results

1. Scientific contribution to the 2016 review of Conservation Measure 51-07: Part 2 – outcomes from the application of the risk assessment framework for distributing the krill trigger level in Area 48

   for distributing the krill trigger level in Area 48, which was described in Part 1 of this work (WG-FSA-16/47 ... for distributing the krill trigger level in Area 48 Microsoft Word File:  fsa-16-48r1.docx Approval:  Approved ... for distributing the krill trigger level in Area 48, which was described in Part 1 of this work (WG-FSA-16/47 ... the application of the risk assessment framework for distributing the krill trigger level in Area 48 ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-16/48 Rev. 1 : Author(s): A. Constable (on behalf of the e-group on CM 51-07 WG-EMM review)

2. REVISION OF THE CONSERVATION MEASURE 51-07 (2009) INTERIM DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRIGGER LEVEL IN KRILL FISHERY IN STATISTICAL SUBAREAS 48.1, 48.2, 48.3 AND 48.4

   DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRIGGER LEVEL IN KRILL FISHERY IN STATISTICAL SUBAREAS 48.1, 48.2, 48.3 AND 48.4 Approval ... REVISION OF THE CONSERVATION MEASURE 51-07 (2009) INTERIM DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRIGGER LEVEL ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-11/27 : Author(s): L. Pshenichnov and G. Milinevsky (Ukraine)

3. On the future revision of the Conservation Measure 51-07 (2009) Interim distribution of the trigger level in the krill fishery in Statistical Subareas 48.1, 48.2, 48.3 and 48.4

   of the Conservation Measure 51-07 (2009) Interim distribution of the trigger level in the krill fishery in Statistical ... On the future revision of the Conservation Measure 51-07 (2009) Interim distribution of the trigger ...

   Meeting Document : CCAMLR-XXIX/47 : Author(s): Delegation of Ukraine

4. Evidence of change to the environment, ecosystem and fishery within Area 48 indicates the need for continued precaution

   Abstract:  CCAMLR manages the krill fishery in Area 48 using a catch limit (the trigger level ... the trigger level. As a consequence of these major risk factors (increased catch levels in Subarea 48.1 ... the trigger level was established. Ideally CCAMLR should establish a process for regularly reviewing whether ... CCAMLR manages the krill fishery in Area 48 using a catch limit (the trigger level) which ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-2019/29 : Author(s): S. Hill and A. Atkinson

5. Advances are urgently needed in providing regular estimates of krill stock status based on the available data

   measure (the trigger level) which was established in 1991 and is “not related to the status of the krill ... the trigger level is not related to the status of the stock. The establishing terms of reference for WG-EMM ... and CCAMLR still manages the krill fishery using the trigger level. Here we describe the single-species ... (the trigger level) which was established in 1991 and is “not related to the status of the krill stock ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-2019/28 : Author(s): S. Hill, J. Hinke, N. Ratcliffe, P. Trathan and G. Watters

6. Is current management of the Antarctic krill fishery in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean precautionary?

   ) for management and reporting purposes. The effective regional catch limit (or ‘trigger level’), established ... years. This suggests that fishing at the trigger level would be equivalent to a long-term exploitation ... exploitation rate in each subarea has remained <3% because annual catches have been <50% of the trigger ... catch limit (or ‘trigger level’), established in 1991, is 0.62 million tonnes year&ndash ... to 48.4) for management and reporting purposes. The effective regional catch limit (or ‘trigger level ... of the regional biomass in recent years. This suggests that fishing at the trigger level would be equivalent ... catches have been <50% of the trigger level since 1991. Comparison with the 9.3% reference exploitation ... catch limit (5.61 million tonnes, established in 2010), and a lower limit, called the trigger level ...

   Science Journal Paper : CCAMLR Science, Volume 23 (CCAMLR Science, Volume 23) : 31–51 : Author(s): Hill, S.L., A. Atkinson, C. Darby, S. Fielding, B.A. Krafft, O.R. Godø, G. Skaret, P.N. Trathan and J.L. Watkins

7. Is current management of the Antarctic krill fishery in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean precautionary?

   , precautionary assessment of exploitation rate in this fishery. The effective regional catch limit (or “trigger ... estimates of the regional biomass in recent years. This suggests that the trigger level would be equivalent ... annual catches have been <50% of the regional trigger level since 1991. The subarea catch limits help ... of exploitation rate in this fishery. The effective regional catch limit (or “trigger level&rdquo ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-16/21 : Author(s): S. Hill, A. Atkinson, C. Darby, S. Fielding, B. Krafft, O.R. Godø, G. Skaret, P. Trathan and J. Watkins

8. DETECTION OF VULNERABLE MARINE ECOSYSTEMS IN THE SOUTHERN SCOTIA ARC (CCAMLR SUBAREAS 48.1 AND 48.2) THROUGH RESEARCH BOTTOM TRAWL SAMPLING AND UNDERWATER IMAGERY

   trigger level that could be used to provide a basis for notification of a VME, based on CCAMLR Scientific ... ’ vs. ‘light’ VME indicator taxa with consequences on the proposed trigger, as well as the rationale ... of VME taxa from bottom trawl samples, we propose one possible trigger level that could be used ... ’ VME indicator taxa with consequences on the proposed trigger, as well as the rationale ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-09/32 : Author(s): S.J. Lockhart and C.D. Jones (USA)

9. Spatial aggregation of harvesting in Subarea 48.1, in particular during the summer and close to the coast

   was closed having reached the Subarea trigger allocation. Though the collective catch comprised 27 ... % of the Subarea trigger allocation, it is uncertain whether any ecological impact ensued ... reached the Subarea trigger allocation. Though the collective catch comprised 27% of the Subarea trigger ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-16/17 : Author(s): P. Trathan and S. Hill

10. Effects of recruitment variability and natural mortality on generalised yield model projections and the CCAMLR decision rules for Antarctic krill

    at the trigger level (lowest catches), at approximately half the precautionary catch limit (intermediate ... the trigger level require verification that the krill recruitment variability, natural mortality, and other ... no fishing, or with fishing at the trigger level (lowest catches), at approximately half the precautionary ... future increases in krill harvests in Area 48 beyond the trigger level require verification ... , 48.2, 48.3 and 48.4) is limited by a trigger level of 620 000 tonnes until a procedure for division ... . Simulations with either no fishing, or with fishing at the trigger level (lowest catches), at approximately ... . Any substantial future increases in krill harvests in Area 48 beyond the trigger level require ... ., 2011). The trigger level of 620 000 tonnes has been fixed at its present level since 1991 ...

    Science Journal Paper : CCAMLR Science, Volume 20 (CCAMLR Science, Volume 20) : 81–96 : Author(s): Kinzey, D., G. Watters and C.S. Reiss

Pages