Результаты поиска

1. A characterisation of the toothfish fishery in the Ross Sea region (Subarea 88.1 and SSRUs 88.2A–B) to 2016–17

   Marine Protected Area (CM 91-05), we recommend catch limit for bycatch species for the North, Slope and ... Abstract:  This report summarises fishing catch and effort in the Ross Sea region (Subarea 88.1 ... and SSRUs 882AB) together with biological characteristics of the catch of Antarctic toothfish through ... the 2017 season. In 2017, sea ice constraints were minimal and catch rates were the second highest on ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-17/07 : Автор(ы): S. Parker and S. Mormede

2. Evidence of change to the environment, ecosystem and fishery within Area 48 indicates the need for continued precaution

   Abstract:  CCAMLR manages the krill fishery in Area 48 using a catch limit (the trigger level ... time catches in Subarea 48.1 have increased beyond the maximum pre-1991 catch for that subarea which ... was used to set the trigger level. As a consequence of these major risk factors (increased catch ... very least Conservation Measure 51-07, which defines subarea catch limits and provides additional ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-2019/29 : Автор(ы): S. Hill and A. Atkinson

3. Revised research plan for the exploratory longline fishery for Dissostichus spp. in Division 58.4.2 in 2014/15

   considering the precautionary catch limit. The catch limits agreed during the meetings in 2013 increased to ... area is still data-poor area showing low recapture rate. Consequently, providing catch and effort data ... paragraph 6 (iii) of CM 21-02 to collect the catch and effort, CTD, tagged and released, recaptured data ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-14/39 : Автор(ы): Delegation of the Republic of Korea

4. Proposal for an acoustic krill biomass survey in CCAMLR Division 58.4.2

   is intended to produce a new estimate of B0 for this Division so that a revised precautionary catch ... limit can be established by CCAMLR. The planned survey will utilise a standardised design as adopted in ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-04/37 : Автор(ы): S. Nicol, S. Kawaguchi, T. Jarvis and T. Pauly (Australia)

5. Data from recent trawl surveys in the vicinity of Heard Island and McDonald Islands (Division 58.5.2), reveal an unusual cohort structure in the mackerel icefish (Champsocephalus gunnari) population

   all present simultaneously. A catch limit of 103 t is recommended for the 2011/12 season. Author(s ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-11/22 : Автор(ы): D.C. Welsford (Australia)

6. Quantifying the impacts of ice on demersal longlining; a case study in CCAMLR Subarea 88.1

   fishing operations and the result of these impacts on fishing such as the time required to reach the catch ... limit and compression of fishing effort due to a reduction in fishing ground extent in years when sea ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-14/55 Rev. 1 : Автор(ы): J.M. Fenaughty and S.J. Parker (New Zealand)

7. Preliminary tag-recapture based population assessment of Antarctic toothfish in Subarea 48.4

   , unchanged from the 2017/18 catch limit. Historically, a precautionary approach has been applied in treating ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-18/26 : Автор(ы): T. Earl and A. Riley

8. e-sc-40-a7.pdf

   ... consistent with the objective of avoiding catch limit overruns, and some improvements to the algorithm were ... compendium detailing the circumstances of catch limit overruns, as this would be helpful in improving ... accordance with CM 42-01 and associated measures. In 2020/21, the catch limit for C. gunnari was 2 132 ... CCAMLR decision rules. Management advice 3.7 The Working Group recommended that the catch limit for application/pdf attached to:WG-FSA-2021

   Meeting Report : WG-FSA-2021

9. Revised research plan for the 2013/14 exploratory longline fishery of Dissostichus spp. in Division 58.4.3a

   to estimate appropriate catch limit, we propose to conduct the current research operation for at ... Abstract:  Catch and effort data recorded by all vessels were analyzed using the latest CCAMLR C2 ... inconveniences for successful research, as it may excessively limit the available area for research hauls. For ... . In this way, over-concentration of catch and effort can be avoided while reducing the inconveniences ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-13/40 : Автор(ы): Delegation of Japan

10. Мониторинг уловов и усилия

    limit. Failure to submit required catch and effort data can result in the closure of the fishery to the ... catch limit. Closure notices will be sent to all Contracting Parties. Each month the Secretariat will ... Introduction Catch and effort data are used to monitor CCAMLR fisheries and to forecast fishery ... closures. Catch and effort data are submitted to the Secretariat by Flag Sates, or their vessels, using the ...

    Page : Site Section: Fisheries

Страницы