Résultats de la recherche

1. Assessment of the Patagonian Toothfish (D. eleginoides) in Subarea 48.3

   catch limit set at around 2,750 tonnes would be expected to keep the stock at or above 50% of B0 after ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-15/59 : Auteur(s): T. Earl, M. Soeffker and C. Darby (United Kingdom)

2. Updated assessment of the risks of status quo krill fishing and proposed revisions to Conservation Measure 51-07

   krill catches in Subareas 48.1-48.3 and 2) current proposals to increase the catch limit in Subarea 48.1 ...

   Meeting Document : SC-CAMLR-XXXV/BG/36 : Auteur(s): Delegation of the USA

3. An assessment of the mackerel icefish (Champsocephalus gunnari) off Heard Island

   conducted at the end of the 1997 fishing season would allow for a catch limit on the Heard plateau of 900 ... separately. Precautionary catch limits calculated using the Generalised Yield model are found to be 180 ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-97/29 : Auteur(s): de la Mare, W.K., Constable, A., Williams, R.

4. Proposal to allow daytime setting of longlines between 15 and 30 April in the Patagonian toothfish longline fishery in CCAMLR Statistical Division 58.5.2

   to the continuation of the current total catch limit of three birds per vessel applicable to the ...

   Meeting Document : WG-IMAF-11/07 : Auteur(s): I. Hay (Australia)

5. Population assessment of Patagonian toothfish in Subarea 48.4 – 2011 update

   52 tonne catch limit to both areas with a sub-division of 5 tonnes allocated specifically for D ... Subarea 48.4 presented in 2010. The CASAL model is improved through the incorporation catch at age data ... , as an alternative to the catch at length data that were the only such data available in 2010. The ... catch at age model generates a yield of 52 tonnes based on CCAMLR decision rules. In 2006 the northern ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-11/38 : Auteur(s): J. Roberts, R. Mitchell and R. Wakeford (United Kingdom)

6. Managing the Ross Sea toothfish fisheries – A response to the consultation responses (COMM CIRC 18/39)

   overall catch limit with the following change to the CM 41-09: (i) all areas outside the Ross Sea region ... Secretariat catch and effort monitoring procedure) and proposes a revised approach for catch and effort ... the current fishing season, calculations will be made on historical catch data for the vessels that ... based on data reported from the current season. Because the catch in the Northern area is so small ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-18/07 : Auteur(s): CCAMLR Secretariat

7. Measurement of capacity in CCAMLR exploratory fisheries in Subareas 88.1 and 88.2: Secretariat update 2016

   measure of potential daily fishing capacity and the catch limit for an area the notified fishing capacity ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-16/05 : Auteur(s): CCAMLR Secretariat

8. Measurement of capacity in CCAMLR exploratory fisheries in Subareas 88.1 and 88.2: Secretariat update 2017

   potential daily fishing capacity and the catch limit for an area the notified fishing capacity in some ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-17/05 : Auteur(s): CCAMLR Secretariat

9. A characterisation of the toothfish fishery in the Ross Sea region (Subarea 88.1 and SSRUs 88.2A–B) to 2016–17

   Marine Protected Area (CM 91-05), we recommend catch limit for bycatch species for the North, Slope and ... Abstract:  This report summarises fishing catch and effort in the Ross Sea region (Subarea 88.1 ... and SSRUs 882AB) together with biological characteristics of the catch of Antarctic toothfish through ... the 2017 season. In 2017, sea ice constraints were minimal and catch rates were the second highest on ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-17/07 : Auteur(s): S. Parker and S. Mormede

10. Evidence of change to the environment, ecosystem and fishery within Area 48 indicates the need for continued precaution

    Abstract:  CCAMLR manages the krill fishery in Area 48 using a catch limit (the trigger level ... time catches in Subarea 48.1 have increased beyond the maximum pre-1991 catch for that subarea which ... was used to set the trigger level. As a consequence of these major risk factors (increased catch ... very least Conservation Measure 51-07, which defines subarea catch limits and provides additional ...

    Meeting Document : WG-EMM-2019/29 : Auteur(s): S. Hill and A. Atkinson

Pages