Résultats de la recherche

1. Continuation of multi-Member research on the Dissostichus eleginoides exploratory fishery in 2017/18 in Division 58.4.3a by France and Japan

   ). The catch limit for Dissostichus spp. is 32 tonnes in 2014/2015 and the total reported catch up was ... 16.3 tonnes. For the season (2015/16), the catch limit was unchanged (32 tonnes) but no catch up was ... vessel. For 2017, one vessel from France visited Division 58.4.3a for a catch of 1.68 tonnes. The ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-17/55 : Auteur(s): Delegations of France and Japan

2. A characterisation of the toothfish fishery in Subareas 88.1 and 88.2 from 1997/98 to 2004/05

   3477 t against a catch limit of 3625 t. The catch limit was almost reached in Subarea 88.1 and exceeded ... toothfish and the associated bycatch. The 2005 D. mawsoni catch was the highest on record with a total of ... in Subarea 88.2. D. mawsoni was the dominant catch in all 11 SSRUs fished. The main bycatch species ... were rattails, which contributed 12% of the catch, and skates which contributed to about 2% of the ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-05/29 : Auteur(s): S.M. Hanchet, M.L. Stevenson, N.L. Phillips and A. Dunn (New Zealand)

3. A characterisation of the toothfish fishery in Subareas 88.1 and 88.2 from 1997–98 to 2010–11

   slope SSRUs 88.1H and 88.1I, and SSRU 88.1K. About 63% of the catch limit in the north was taken from ... 88.1C with the rest taken from SSRU 88.1B. The catch limit from the shelf was taken mainly from 881J ... location of fishing together with the catch of Dissostichus spp. and bycatch species by year for the period ... 1997–98 to 2010–11. During the 2010–11 fishing year most of the catch in Subarea 88.1 came from the ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-11/45 : Auteur(s): M.L. Stevenson, S.M. Hanchet, S. Mormede and A. Dunn (New Zealand)

4. Further investigations in the assessment of Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) in Subarea 88.2 SSRUs 88.2C–H for the years 2002–03 to 2012–13

   the stock assessment including all data from SSRUs 88.2C-H and the catch limit applied to the same ... SSRU 88.2H is recognised by allocating a greater proportion of the catch limit to SSRUs 88.2C–G and ...

   Meeting Document : WG-SAM-14/29 : Auteur(s): S. Mormede, A. Dunn and S.M. Hanchet (New Zealand)

5. Characteristics of krill aggregations in 48.4 subdivision during January–February 2000

   recommended precautionary catch limit. There have been revealed that potential fishing grounds could be ... potential fishing grounds to remove the recommended precautionary catch limit. The latter is an important ... corresponding to recommended precautionary limit could be possible from such grounds, however, the predicted ... catch per trawling hour is low Therefore, the investigations carries out demonstrated a practical ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-01/42 : Auteur(s): S.M. Kasatkina, A.P. Malyshko, V.N.Shnar and O.A. Berezhinskiy (Russia)

6. The orderly development of the krill fishery

   Abstract:  During deliberations at CCAMLR XXV on revising the precautionary catch limit for krill ... establish a catch limit before fishing is prosecuted in these areas. o Small-scale management units be ... recommends that: o Krill stock surveys be undertaken in areas with no precautionary catch limits in order to ... capacity be established for the fishery relative to the catch limits (small or large scale spatial limits ...

   Meeting Document : CCAMLR-XXVI/30 : Auteur(s): Delegation of Australia

7. Research plan for the exploratory longline fishery for Dissostichus spp. in 2014/15 in Division 58.4.3a

   coming years in order to achieve a robust stock assessment that would provide advice on a catch limit ... . Maintaining the catch limit to 32 tons is suggested for expect a number of recaptures of 35 in 2014/15. Author ...

   Meeting Document : WG-SAM-14/17 : Auteur(s): Delegation of France

8. Updating the Antarctic krill biomass estimates for CCAMLR Subareas 48.1 to 48.4 using available data

   biomass) and that the potential exploitation rates implied by the operational catch limit (the trigger ... catch limit which is currently appropriate for achieving the conservation criteria for the krill stock ... . The index also suggests that realised exploitation rates were below 0.5% (i.e. catch was <0.5% of ... . It also suggests that the catch levels seen in the first decade of the 21st century are unlikely to ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-15/28 : Auteur(s): S. Hill, A. Atkinson, C. Darby, S. Fielding (United Kingsom), B. Krafft, O.R. Godø, G. Skaret (Norway), P. Trathan, J. Watkins (United Kingdom)

9. Assessment models for Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) in the Ross Sea region to 2016/17

   . This yield is higher than that specified for 2018 in CM 91-05, which states that “the total catch limit ... catch limit be set at 3 157 tonnes for the 2018 and 2019 fishing seasons as per CM 91-05. Author(s):  S ... ), using catch, catch-at-age, and tag-recapture data from 1998 to 2017 and including the results from the ... rules and two potential catch splits between the Shelf, Slope, and North areas of the Ross Sea region ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-17/37 Rev. 1 : Auteur(s): S. Mormede

10. Matlab code for calculating krill biomass in a survey area

    ) to recalculate the catch limit for Antarctic krill in the Scotia Sea based on updated acoustic ... recalculate the catch limit for Antarctic krill in the Scotia Sea based on updated acoustic algorithms ...

    Meeting Document : SG-ASAM-16/03 : Auteur(s): A. Cossio, J. Renfree and C. Reiss

Pages