Search results

1. e-sc-38-a5.pdf

   ... for precaution is likely to be greater now than when the trigger level was established and suggested ... , the Working Group noted that CM 51-07, which allocates the trigger level among subareas, may inadvertently ... of penguin colonies, and how the fishery has been able to consistently reach the Subarea 48.1 trigger limit ... are for monthly catch and effort reporting for Subarea 48.2 until catch once reaches 80% of its trigger limit ... . The papers expressed that the need for precaution is likely to be greater now than when the trigger ... Working Group noted that CM 51-07, which allocates the trigger level among subareas, may inadvertently ... penguin colonies, and how the fishery has been able to consistently reach the Subarea 48.1 trigger limit ... once reaches 80% of its trigger limit, operators are already voluntarily reporting at five-day application/pdf attached to:WG-EMM-2019

   Meeting Report : WG-EMM-2019

2. e-sc-xxxiii.pdf

   ... Subarea 48.1, which reached 94% of its allocated trigger level (155 000 tonnes) and was closed on 17 May ... allocated trigger level has been reached for the third time in Subarea 48.1 and that this is likely ... and effort while the total catch is less than 50–80% of the trigger level, and five-day reporting when ... vessels in Subarea 48.1 once the monthly catch of krill exceeded 10% of the trigger level allocated ... reached 94% of its allocated trigger level (155 000 tonnes) and was closed on 17 May 2014. This closure ... -XXXIII/BG/01). 3.2 Dr E. Barrera-Oro (Argentina) highlighted that the interim allocated trigger level ... trigger level, and five-day reporting when catches exceed 50–80%. 3.7 The Scientific Committee noted ... monthly catch of krill exceeded 10% of the trigger level allocated in that subarea. The Secretariat would application/pdf attached to:SC-CAMLR-XXXIII

   Meeting Report : SC-CAMLR-XXXIII

3. e-sc-xxvi.pdf

   application/pdf attached to:SC-CAMLR-XXVI

   Meeting Report : SC-CAMLR-XXVI

4. e-cc-xxvii.pdf

   ... , the current catch trigger level of 620 000 tonnes in Conservation Measure 51-01 remains the only way ... to manage the developing krill fishery in terms of serving as a trigger for apportioning the krill ... trigger level of 620 000 tonnes may not be as precautionary as previously assumed (SC-CAMLR-XXVII ... the precautionary krill catch limit. Therefore, the current catch trigger level of 620 000 tonnes in ... a trigger for apportioning the krill precautionary catch limit (SC-CAMLR-XXVII, paragraph 3.31 ... ). However, most Members considered the current trigger level of 620 000 tonnes may not be as precautionary application/pdf attached to:CCAMLR-XXVII

   Meeting Report : CCAMLR-XXVII

5. e-sc-xxvii.pdf

   ... assessments were based on yield multipliers that scaled the yield from zero, through the current trigger ... with the trigger level); (iv) under Options 2 and 3 the risk of negative impacts on predators increased at yield ... of SSMUs would be constrained even though the total annual catch is only 17% of the trigger level (Annex ... 4, paragraph 2.92); (ii) decisions regarding the current trigger level are matters for the Commission ... (the harvest rate consistent with the trigger level); (iv) under Options 2 and 3 the risk of negative ... be constrained even though the total annual catch is only 17% of the trigger level (Annex 4 ... , paragraph 2.92); (ii) decisions regarding the current trigger level are matters for the Commission application/pdf attached to:SC-CAMLR-XXVII

   Meeting Report : SC-CAMLR-XXVII

6. e-sc-xxix.pdf

   ... % of the trigger level for the subarea (155 000 tonnes). This was the first time that the krill fishery has ... 4 been closed because it has reached one of the trigger levels, noting that these were introduced ... approached the trigger level, principally because of the voluntary reporting of catches at five-day ... % of the trigger level for Area 48 (CM 23-06) was not consistent with the spatial allocation of the trigger level ... ). 3.3 The krill fishery in Subarea 48.1 was closed when the catch reached 99.8% of the trigger level ... closed because it has reached one of the trigger levels, noting that these were introduced for the first ... trigger level for Area 48 (CM 23-06) was not consistent with the spatial allocation of the trigger level application/pdf attached to:SC-CAMLR-XXIX

   Meeting Report : SC-CAMLR-XXIX

7. e-cc-xxix.pdf

   ... % of the trigger level for the subarea (155 000 tonnes). The catch in Subarea 48.1 was the highest ever recorded ... of the apportioned trigger levels introduced in 2009 (Conservation Measure (CM) 51-07). 4.8 The Commission noted ... % of the trigger level for Area 48 (CM 23-06) was not consistent with the spatial allocation of the trigger level ... that the 80% level (and subsequently the 50% level) in CM 23-06 should apply to the subarea-specific trigger ... closed when the catch reached 99.8% of the trigger level for the subarea (155 000 tonnes). The catch in ... had been closed because catches had reached one of the apportioned trigger levels introduced in 2009 ... begin reporting catches at 10-day intervals once the catch reaches 80% of the trigger level for Area 48 ... (CM 23-06) was not consistent with the spatial allocation of the trigger level among subareas application/pdf attached to:CCAMLR-XXIX

   Meeting Report : CCAMLR-XXIX

8. e-sc-xx-a4.pdf

   application/pdf attached to:WG-EMM-01

   Meeting Report : WG-EMM-01

9. e-cc-xxxv.pdf

   ... of advice on the spatial distribution of the trigger level; assessment and avoidance of incidental ... allocation of the krill trigger level between subareas was a major item for consideration this year ... of the trigger. These considerations are in SC-CAMLR-XXXV, paragraphs 3.55 to 3.112. 5.11 The Commission noted ... towards the trigger level. As articulated in CCAMLR-XXXV/16, Australia reiterated that CM 51-07 should ... trigger level; assessment and avoidance of incidental mortality of Antarctic marine living resources ... of the krill trigger level between subareas was a major item for consideration this year and that ... of the trigger. These considerations are in SC-CAMLR-XXXV, paragraphs 3.55 to 3.112. 5.11 The ... Area 48 as it progressed towards the trigger level. As articulated in CCAMLR-XXXV/16, Australia application/pdf attached to:CCAMLR-XXXV

   Meeting Report : CCAMLR-XXXV

10. e-cc-xix.pdf

    ... Regulatory Framework Trigger Levels in the Management of the Krill Fishery (iii) COOPERATION ... 5.9). The Commission also considered the use of trigger levels; the discussion is reported ... IUU Fishing Regulatory Framework Trigger Levels in the Management of the Krill Fishery ... , paragraph 5.9). The Commission also considered the use of trigger levels; the discussion is reported in application/pdf attached to:CCAMLR-XIX

    Meeting Report : CCAMLR-XIX

Pages