Результаты поиска

1. Risk assessment framework for subdividing the krill catch trigger level, including relevant background data and information

   the krill catch trigger level, including relevant background data and information Microsoft Word File ...

   Meeting Document : SC-CAMLR-XXXV/BG/37

2. Analysis of variability of krill size and fish by-catch in Japanese krill fishery based on scientific observer data

   (Japan) Title:  Analysis of variability of krill size and fish by-catch in Japanese krill fishery based ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-12/68 : Автор(ы): T. Okuda and M. Kiyota (Japan)

3. A review of methodologies aimed at avoiding and/or mitigating incidental catch of protected seabirds.

   methodologies aimed at avoiding and/or mitigating incidental catch of protected seabirds. Approval:  Approved ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-05/P8 : Автор(ы): Bull, L.

4. By-catch of juvenile Antarctic fish from krill (Euphausia superba Dana) fisheries in the South Georgia area, in 1992

   (Ukraine) Title:  By-catch of juvenile Antarctic fish from krill (Euphausia superba Dana) fisheries in the ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-93/8 Rev. 1 : Автор(ы): E.A. Pakhomov and S.A. Pankratov (Ukraine)

5. Best practice seabird by-catch mitigation for Spanish-rig longline vessels with emphasis on line weighting regimes

   (Argentina), G. McPherson (Australia) and J.-P. Seco Pon (Argentina) Title:  Best practice seabird by-catch ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-06/22 : Автор(ы): G. Robertson (Australia), C.A. Moreno (Chile), B. Wienecke (Australia), P. Gandini (Argentina), G. McPherson (Australia) and J.-P. Seco Pon (Argentina)

6. Summary of the toothfish fishery and tagging program in the Amundsen Sea region (SSRUs 882C–H) to 2017/18

   the catch limit from 200 t. Research block 882_1: 240 t based on CPUE by seabed area and allowing a ... maximum of 20% change in the catch limit from 200 t. Research block 882_2: 240 t based on a one-year ... % change in the catch limit from 200 t. Research block 882_3: 160 t based on CPUE by seabed area and ... allowing a maximum of 20% change in the catch limit from 200 t. Research block 882_4: 214 t based on CPUE ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-18/36 : Автор(ы): S. Mormede and S. Parker

7. A characterisation of the toothfish fishery in Subareas 88.1 and 88.2 from 1997/98 to 2006/07

   the second highest on record with a total of 3431 t against a combined catch limit of 3579 t. The ... fishery by having fewer catch limits. This appeared to be moderately successful, with only one catch limit ... there was a large overrun of the catch limit in the North region, the overall catch limit for Subarea ... 88.1 was only exceeded by 2%. The catch limit was under caught in Subarea 88.2. The concentration of ...

   Meeting Document : WG-FSA-07/28 : Автор(ы): S.M. Hanchet, M.L. Stevenson and A. Dunn (New Zealand)

8. A feedback management strategy for the krill fishery in Subarea 48.1

   the present summer, the local catch limit will be increased.  2). If penguin recruitment is expected ... krill biomass has not increased during the summer, the local catch limit will not be adjusted.  3) If ... through the forthcoming winter is very high, the local catch limit will be decreased.  4) If penguin ... through the forthcoming winter, the local catch limit will be set to zero.  Implementation of the FBM ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-16/48 : Автор(ы): G.M. Watters, J.T. Hinke and C.S. Reiss

9. Spatio–temporal dynamics of Antarctic krill fishery: identification of fishing hotspots

   catch limit, representing 0.11 the allowable catch limit for CCAMLR Area 48, and further divided by ... those years when the precautionary catch limit is reached. These events occur mainly in the centre of ... (>10 ton∙km-2) during years when the catch limit is reached. The analysis show that the krill ... months. FH identified are small, equivalent to a circle of radius 25 km, and have a high catch density ...

   Meeting Document : WG-EMM-16/52 : Автор(ы): F. Santa Cruz, B. Ernst and J.A. Arata

10. Estimates of local biomass with uncertainty for Antarctic (Dissostichus mawsoni) and Patagonian (D. eleginoides) toothfish in research blocks in Subareas 48.6 and 58.4

    limit is determined as 0.8 times the existing catch limit. The revised catch limits for all but one of ... of WG-SAM. The trend analysis decision rules developed by WG-FSA 17 were applied to provide catch ... and 486_4. However, as the trend in all three of these research blocks was declining the revised catch ... the research blocks was determined by the requirement that the absolute change in the existing catch ...

    Meeting Document : WG-FSA-18/12 : Автор(ы): CCAMLR Secretariat

Страницы